← All work

Case study · Optimizely

Personalization Center

Client
Optimizely Configured Commerce
My role
Product designer: customer interviews, wireframes, prototype, desirability testing
Worked with
Product & engineering stakeholders, Client Advisory Board (CAB)
Status
Concept validated with 30 customers · not shipped
Personalization Center Get Started page, showing conversion analytics and goal cards that each suggest a personalization feature

01 — Problem

Powerful features customers couldn't find

70+

personalization features, spread across different corners of the admin.

Configured Commerce gave B2B sellers more than 70 ways to tailor the buying experience, but there was no single place to find them. A feature customers can't find is a feature they don't use.

Goal

Make personalization easy to discover and easy to act on, so any team can tailor its storefront without needing a dedicated marketing department.

02 — Research

Customers didn't know what they already had

I interviewed members of our Client Advisory Board (CAB) about how they find and use personalization. Three themes came up again and again.

Finding 01

The problem is discovery, not capability

Customers wanted to personalize, but often didn't know where a feature lived, or that it existed at all.

Finding 02

Support was covering for the gap

Personalization drove frequent support tickets, and the help docs were hard to find and interpret. That costs clients and our support team time, and it doesn't scale.

Finding 03

They wanted guidance, not just tools

Most CAB members asked for help deciding what to personalize to stand out, especially mid-market teams with enterprise demands and small staffs.

03 — Shared goals

Three goals, agreed on together

Whiteboard from the stakeholder session, mapping personalization features and goals
Stakeholder whiteboardClick to enlarge

I brought the research into a whiteboard session with product and engineering stakeholders so we could agree on what the Personalization Center had to do before anyone designed a screen. Each goal links directly to a part of the final design:

  • Consolidate all 70+ features in one place → the Features page.
  • Show performance so teams can make informed decisions → analytics on Get Started.
  • Guide creation instead of leaving users to figure it out → Goals and the setup wizard.

04 — Key design decisions

Organized around outcomes, not features

Get Started page with analytics and goal cards

Start with the business goal

Customers think "I want fewer abandoned carts," not "I need the Offer Promotion feature." So the entry page leads with goals. Each one recommends a feature and opens a wizard that walks through setup.

The tabs follow the same idea: Conversions, Product Discoverability, Customer Engagement and Sales, with relevant metrics shown next to the goals they relate to.

Features page listing personalization features by category

One home for every feature

For users who already know what they want, the Features page lists all 70+ features grouped into familiar areas: Catalog, Promotions, Content, Search, and Shipping & Fulfillment.

Every feature gets a one-line, plain-language description of what it does for the buyer, so the page also serves as a way to discover features.

Existing Personalizations table with filters for feature type, segment and date

Show what's already running

Customers had no single view of the personalizations they'd already set up. Existing Personalizations lists them all, filterable by feature type, customer segment and date, with favorites pinned to the top.

Customer Segments table inside the Personalization Center

Bring segments next to the features that use them

Almost every personalization targets a customer segment, so I moved Customer Segments into the Personalization Center instead of leaving it in a separate area. Moving it has a cost for long-time users, and that trade-off came up in testing.

05 — Iteration

From wireframe to hi-fi

Early wireframe with feature-type tabs and text prompts
Early wireframeClick to enlarge
Final Get Started page with outcome tabs and goal cards
Final hi-fiClick to enlarge

I kept the wireframes rough so we could change them quickly, and reviewed each round live with internal stakeholders and CAB members. Across those rounds, the landing page changed in three ways:

  • Tabs changed from feature types to outcomes. "Pricing based / Product based / Customer based" became Conversions, Discoverability, Engagement and Sales. The feature-type groupings moved to the Features page.
  • Text prompts became Goal cards you can act on. Each goal now carries a suggested feature and a wizard to set it up.
  • Placeholder metrics became real analytics, with comparisons to the previous period, so teams can see whether a change worked.

06 — Validation

30 customers rated every page

I shared the hi-fi prototype with 30 CAB members. They rated each page on desirability and perceived value, and told us why.

Desirability uses our UX team's internal 0–100 likeability score, which shows how much someone would want to use the page. Perceived value was rated separately.

Get Started

Desirability72/100
Perceived value: Very valuable

Customers liked the page, but worried that the Goals might be too generic for their particular business.

Features

Desirability78/100
Perceived value: Extremely valuable

Met expectations by putting every feature in one place. Some asked for better organization within the list.

Existing Personalizations

Desirability81/100
Perceived value: Extremely valuable

The highest score. It met a need customers hadn't been able to cover before, helping small teams keep track of their campaigns.

Customer Segments

Desirability70/100
Perceived value: Valuable

The move made sense to customers, but they warned it could confuse long-time users.

In their words

[Is this where] you can improve your goals based on your site and metrics? If so, I think this would be great to add.

CAB member, building-supply distributorOn Get Started

It appears to be a way to view and track current personalization tactics… which would also be fantastic!

CAB member, pet food manufacturerOn Existing Personalizations

What the feedback pointed to

Make Goals fit each business, add structure to the features list, and help long-time users find features that moved.

07 — Outcome & takeaways

Validated, but never shipped

The Personalization Center didn't ship before my role was eliminated in a company layoff. It was still a complete, customer-validated concept: research, wireframes, a hi-fi prototype, and desirability results from 30 CAB members.

If I'd stayed on

What I'd do next

  • Let teams adjust Goals to their own business metrics.
  • Add search, filters and grouping within the Features list.
  • Add redirects and in-app hints from old locations, so long-time users don't get lost.
  • Measure success by changes in support tickets and how many features customers use.
What I learned

Design for the outcome customers want

  • Lead with goals, not feature names. The biggest change came from organizing around what customers want to achieve instead of how the product is built.
  • Moving features has a cost. Consolidating helps new users and disrupts long-time ones. Plan the transition as carefully as the new home.
  • Talk to customers early and often. Unlike on earlier teams, I was in regular contact with real customers, so problems surfaced in wireframes instead of after launch.